<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Looking at Video on the Web with Ken McCarthy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://systemvideoblog.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://systemvideoblog.com</link>
	<description>Video, filmmaking, marketing and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:03:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How to use Internet video to beat the search engines</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/12/01/beat-the-search-engines/</link>
		<comments>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/12/01/beat-the-search-engines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Video Ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/?p=244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;ve probably seen that Google search results feature videos now, often above-the-fold in the top ten rankings.  
Do you think people click on these videos? You bet they do.
The good news is that while Google displays thousands of results for any given search term, they only display a handful of videos, sometimes just two. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve probably seen that Google search results feature videos now, often above-the-fold in the top ten rankings.  </p>
<p>Do you think people click on these videos? You bet they do.</p>
<p>The good news is that while Google displays thousands of results for any given search term, they only display a handful of videos, sometimes just two. </p>
<p>It makes this particular Google &#8220;real estate&#8221; extremely valuable&#8230;</p>
<p>The challenge is how do you get to be one of the lucky ones?</p>
<p>Amazingly, this is actually one of the easiest things to do in search marketing &#8211; if you know how.</p>
<p>&#8230;And these guys know how. </p>
<p>This is a very solid course and the only Internet video marketing course I&#8217;ve ever recommended&#8230;even if the promotional video is a little over the top.  </p>
<p>Details:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.1shoppingcart.com/app/?af=1277113">How to use Internet video to beat the search engines</a></p>
<p>- Ken </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/12/01/beat-the-search-engines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The secret is out</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/11/27/the-secret-is-out/</link>
		<comments>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/11/27/the-secret-is-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 01:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Video Ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is one of those things I&#8217;ve been profiting from for several years and been meaning to share &#8220;when I got around to it.&#8221; 
If you&#8217;ve read ALL the articles on this blog, connected all the dots and done a few dozen (or a few hundred) hours of experimentation, you might have already figured it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of those things I&#8217;ve been profiting from for several years and been meaning to share &#8220;when I got around to it.&#8221; </p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve read ALL the articles on this blog, connected all the dots and done a few dozen (or a few hundred) hours of experimentation, you might have already figured it out on your own. </p>
<p>But wouldn&#8217;t you know, two guys came along and took it light years beyond even the best cutting-edge strategies I&#8217;ve been sharing on these pages.</p>
<p><strong>Why you should get on this now</strong></p>
<p>Long story made short&#8230;I was in Toronto last weekend getting some much needed R &#038; R and also attending an outstanding Gauher Chaudhry seminar where I met a lot of very bright folks. </p>
<p>On one of the breaks I heard a guy talking about Internet video marketing and I couldn&#8217;t resist eavesdropping. </p>
<p>I assumed I&#8217;d pick up a trick or two, but quickly realized he&#8217;d taken Internet video marketing to a whole another level.  </p>
<p>It turns out his name is Alex Goad. He lives in Montreal (my favorite city) and he and his partner have blown way past even my best recommendations. </p>
<p><strong>Free tools &#8211; if you act fast </strong></p>
<p>Better yet &#8211; and by lucky coincidence &#8211; this weekend Alex is giving away some of his very best stuff to help raise the profile on a new course he&#8217;s launching soon </p>
<p>I was so excited about what he showed me that I&#8217;ve postponed dinner with a friend to get this message out to you so you don&#8217;t miss it. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s the best thing I&#8217;ve ever seen on using video to market on the Internet. </p>
<p>Details:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.1shoppingcart.com/app/?af=1277113">How to make Google send you free qualified traffic with Internet video</a></p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Ken </p>
<p>P.S. This is a somewhat slick presentation, but don&#8217;t worry. It has nothing to do with those losers known as &#8220;The Syndicate.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an excellent course at a fair and righteous prices&#8230;something those Syndicate guys don&#8217;t have a clue how to do.</p>
<p>Details:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.1shoppingcart.com/app/?af=1277113">How to make Google send you free qualified traffic with Internet video</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/11/27/the-secret-is-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPad love</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/11/10/ipad-love/</link>
		<comments>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/11/10/ipad-love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I finally got one&#8230;
I won it in a sales contest&#8230;never would have bought one.
On the other hand, now that I have one, I&#8217;m very glad to have it. 
The MacBook Air (my previous lightweight option) was a piece of ****. It was lightweight alright, in every sense of the word. I don&#8217;t know anyone who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally got one&#8230;</p>
<p>I won it in a sales contest&#8230;never would have bought one.</p>
<p>On the other hand, now that I have one, I&#8217;m very glad to have it. </p>
<p>The MacBook Air (my previous lightweight option) was a piece of ****. It was lightweight alright, in every sense of the word. I don&#8217;t know anyone who likes &#8220;the Air&#8221; but I do know many people who foam at the mouth at the very mention of it.</p>
<p>The iPad, in contrast, actually does what it&#8217;s supposed to do which is:</p>
<p>1. Let you carry out basic Internet functions (mail, browsing, audio and video)&#8230;</p>
<p>2. With a small, lightweight device</p>
<p>iPhones etc. are a little too small for real video watching as far as I&#8217;m concerned. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure someone has mentioned this somewhere already, but it not here goes:</p>
<p>Thanks to the iPad, we now have graduated from 24/7/365 video on demand&#8230;(who needs TV anymore?)&#8230;to PORTABLE 24/7/365 video on demand (as long as there is a wireless signal.)</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a pretty big leap of evolution (even though I know they&#8217;ve had something like this in South Korea for at least four years!) </p>
<p>What&#8217;s next? </p>
<p>There must be something that&#8217;s &#8220;next&#8221; but once all the world&#8217;s video is available on demand 24/7/365 on a portable and truly useful device, what could possibly be next in the video world? </p>
<p>Improvements in detail, in delivery, in price etc. sure, but with this device we&#8217;ve reached the Promised Land&#8230;if the Promised Land means being able to carry around a device that lets you access video on demand on any subject under the sun at any time of day or night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/11/10/ipad-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social media reality check (again)</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/04/22/social-media-reality-check-again/</link>
		<comments>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/04/22/social-media-reality-check-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 02:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social media is hot. 
It&#8217;s also one of the hottest refuges for scammers and BS artists. 
I recently made the mistake of doing some pro bono work for a good cause run by amateurs. (Long story and a mistake I will never repeat.)
Throughout the process, I&#8217;ve been told I have to meet with this social [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social media is hot. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s also one of the hottest refuges for scammers and BS artists. </p>
<p>I recently made the mistake of doing some pro bono work for a good cause run by amateurs. (Long story and a mistake I will never repeat.)</p>
<p>Throughout the process, I&#8217;ve been told I have to meet with this social marketing expert and that one, the implication being they have something of value to bring to the party that&#8217;s more important than actually getting the job done.  (These folks LOVE meetings. They don&#8217;t like work.) </p>
<p>Meanwhile, I patiently try to explain to these wing nuts that the only currency that means anything in Internet marketing is the size of your e-mail list (prospects and customers). Not how many &#8220;friends&#8221; you have, how many people &#8220;follow&#8221; you on Twitter, or how much chatter there is about you in the blogosphere. </p>
<p>Hey, I like Twitter and I know people who get some good things from Facebook, but I don&#8217;t know anyone who would trade a solid e-mail list to become king of Twitter or Facebook. </p>
<p>Conversely, I know plenty of social media masters who are one step away from living in a &#8220;van down by the river.&#8221; (Google it. If you don&#8217;t know the Saturday Night Live routine that phrase is from, you&#8217;re in for some serious laughter.)</p>
<p>Anyway, after listening the the millionth and one social media &#8220;genius&#8221;  I took a look at some of my own social media stats. (My social media weapon of choice being video.)</p>
<p>Here are my numbers: </p>
<p>1. I&#8217;ve pushed one video over the 2,800,000 views mark<br />
2. I&#8217;ve pushed two over the 1,200,000 views mark<br />
3. I&#8217;ve pushed seventeen over the 100,000 view mark (sixteen singehandedly, one in partnership)</p>
<p>Total cash expenditure: zero dollars.</p>
<p> It was all accomplished by viral marketing, also know as &#8220;word of mouth&#8221; and all these hits were kicked off with mailing to an e-mail list. No Twitter. No Facebook. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure there are social media &#8220;gurus&#8221; who could turn these stats into speaking gigs at the latest social media conferences, television appearances, and books on how to &#8220;crush it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Me? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m very unimpressed by my own accomplishments. </p>
<p>Why? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m in SALES.</p>
<p>How many leads did I generate? How many sales did I close? How many people did I induce to come back and buy a second and third and fourth time? </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get real folks. </p>
<p>Social media is gravy. </p>
<p>You better have a meal to put it on. </p>
<p>Focus on what matters. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/04/22/social-media-reality-check-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to get an Academy Award nomination &#8211; on a budget</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/03/03/how-to-get-an-academy-award-nomination/</link>
		<comments>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/03/03/how-to-get-an-academy-award-nomination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academy award documentary how to]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/?p=171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;When all the odds are stacked against you
My friend Rick Goldsmith has just received his second nomination for an Academy Award, this time for his feature length documentary &#8220;The Most Dangerous Man in America&#8221; which he made with Judith Erhlich. 
Rick&#8217;s previous nomination was for &#8220;Tell the Truth and Run.&#8221; 
That was back in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8230;When all the odds are stacked against you</strong></p>
<p>My friend Rick Goldsmith has just received his <em><strong>second</strong></em> nomination for an Academy Award, this time for his feature length documentary &#8220;The Most Dangerous Man in America&#8221; which he made with Judith Erhlich. </p>
<p>Rick&#8217;s previous nomination was for &#8220;Tell the Truth and Run.&#8221; </p>
<p>That was back in the days when the web was young (mid 1990s.) Rick and I put together one of the first web sites built around a movie. The site looks pretty primitive now, but pioneering things often do.  (We haven&#8217;t updated it in at least ten years, but it still gets the job done!)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty amazing to get nominated for an Academy Award, even more amazing for it to happen twice.. especially for films made on a limited budget and on serious subjects.<br />
<span id="more-171"></span><br />
Rick specializes in making films about people who tell the truth under difficult circumstances, something this country and world can use a lot more of. </p>
<p><strong>How to get nominated for an Academy Award &#8211; Step One</strong></p>
<p>Truth be told, I don&#8217;t know 101 techniques to get nominated for an Academy Award, but I do know the details of how Rick got nominated the first time. It&#8217;s a story that has inspired me continuously since the day I first heard it and I&#8217;ve shared it with many people over the years.</p>
<p>The topic: George Seldes&#8230;the grandfather of investigative journalism in America. </p>
<p>Among other things,  Seldes was  the first to report on the cover up of the science that showed modern cigarettes were designed to be addictive and caused cancer (this back in the 1940s!) His work inspired Studs Turkel, Howard Zinn,  Ralph Nader, IF Stone, and the subject of &#8220;The Most Dangerous Man in America&#8221; Daniel Ellsberg. </p>
<p>Rick learned about Seldes after learning that Seldes had passed his 100th birthday and shot some interviews with him using a Hi8 video camera. </p>
<p>Over time (and on his own time), Rick developed these interviews into a full length feature documentary <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117873/">Tell the Truth and Run</a> which captured not only the details of Seldes&#8217; remarkable career, but also many of the big events of world history from the World War I to the Cold War.  Along the way, he recruited Susan Sarandon and Ed Asner as narrators. </p>
<p>Step One: Make a great piece on a subject you believe in and get it done any way you can.</p>
<p><strong>How to get nominated for an Academy Award &#8211; Step Two</strong></p>
<p>The original version of &#8220;Tell the Truth and Run&#8221; was actually a <strong><em>video</em></strong> which made it ineligible  for an Academy Award, so getting a nomination was the furthest thing from Rick&#8217;s mind. Nonetheless, he carried out the second essential task in making a film which is to tirelessly promote the finished work.</p>
<p>One of the places he brought his work to was the San Francisco Jewish Film Festival. A lady in the audience came up to him and said: &#8220;That&#8217;s such a great film. It should be nominated for an Academy Award.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rick filled her in on the facts. In order for a film to be nominated, it has to be on film (not video) and it has to have a run in a New York or Los Angeles theater. (Dear reader: Check the details. The requirements may have changed since the mid 1990s.)</p>
<p>The lady then asked Rick what it would cost to transfer the video to film and exhibit in a &#8220;real&#8221; theater in order for the film to be qualified. He told her and she raised the money and made it happen. </p>
<p><strong>How to get nominated for an Academy Award &#8211; Step Three</strong></p>
<p>Step Three is to contact the Academy and put your film in the running. I imagine all the current information you need to know about how to do this is on their web site. </p>
<p>Here are key take-aways from this story:</p>
<p>1. Rick made the film he believed in, not something he thought would be sexy or award winning<br />
2. He made a beautifully crafted piece of work, in spite of a low budget and in spite of a scarcity of free time<br />
3. He got the film out there and by doing so created fans for it<br />
4. With the help of one fan, he thought &#8220;outside the box&#8221; (don&#8217;t you hate that term?) and turned an illegible video into an eligible one by learning and and following the rules<br />
5. He threw his hat in the ring</p>
<p>End result: An Academy Award nomination. </p>
<p><strong>So what happened?</strong> </p>
<p>Did &#8220;Tell the Truth and Run&#8221; win?</p>
<p>No, that year the prize went to an acquaintance of mine Leon Gast from my Film Center days in New York City. (If you&#8217;re in the film biz you know the legendary/notorious Film Center on Ninth Avenue.)</p>
<p>Actually, Leon was more than an acquaintance. He was the client of an audio post-production firm I helped my friend Bill Markle (aka William Markle) get off the ground back in the late 1980s when digital sound editing was brand new.  </p>
<p>Leon&#8217;s film: &#8220;When We Were Kings&#8221; &#8211; a documentary about boxer Mohammed Ali. </p>
<p>Truth be told, no one was going to beat Ali in 1996, but this year, for &#8220;The Most Dangerous Man in America&#8221;? &#8211; I&#8217;m cautiously optimistic. </p>
<p>After all, the Saints won the Super Bowl. This may be the year when ANYTHING can happen. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be watching the Award ceremony in New Orleans and you know what happened the last time that happened&#8230;Go Rick!</p>
<p><strong>Ken McCarthy</strong></p>
<p>P.S. I&#8217;m not going to miss an opportunity to plug my own work&#8230;</p>
<p>Our annual seminar is coming up soon &#8211; April 9 &#8211; 11 in Chicago. </p>
<p>You can learn about it and actually start learning from some of the industry&#8217;s leading experts, right now &#8211;  for <strong>free</strong>.</p>
<p>Details: <a href="http://thesystemblog.com/welcome-to-the-system-faculty-interviews/">The annual System Seminar 2010 &#8211; Chicago </a> </p>
<p>Why you should consider investing your time in looking into this?</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested in Internet marketing, it&#8217;s possible to learn directly from the guy who put on the <strong>original</strong> Internet marketing seminar and was an early innovator in the areas of: banner advertising  (1994), legitimate e-mail marketing (1994), auto-responders (1997), PPC (2000), online video advertising (2004) and now mobile marketing (2007.) </p>
<p>Since then, we&#8217;ve put on dozens of trainings and helped countless people &#8211; including many folks who are now industry leaders &#8211; get started in the business on the right foot. </p>
<p>You could be our next success story. Why not? Our students, friends, and clients have a remarkable track record of doing great things. </p>
<p>Details: <a href="http://thesystemblog.com/welcome-to-the-system-faculty-interviews/">The annual System Seminar 2010 &#8211; Chicago </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/03/03/how-to-get-an-academy-award-nomination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At last, a reason for HD: Prairie Home Companion</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/01/09/at-last-a-reason-for-hd-prairie-home-companion/</link>
		<comments>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/01/09/at-last-a-reason-for-hd-prairie-home-companion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD live theater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the way HD looks, but for the longest time it seemed like overkill. 
I mean do we really need digital transmission and HD quality on our television sets? Really? 
But here&#8217;s a use of HD that is truly exciting: real time transmission of live performances to theater audiences around the world. 
A variation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the way HD looks, but for the longest time it seemed like overkill. </p>
<p>I mean do we really need digital transmission and HD quality on our television sets? Really? </p>
<p>But here&#8217;s a use of HD that is truly exciting: real time transmission of live performances to theater audiences around the world. </p>
<p>A variation of this has existed for a long time (ex. championship boxing matches), but this is a much more interesting use. </p>
<p><strong>The next best thing to being there</strong></p>
<p>The pioneer of this new approach seems to have been the NY Metropolitan Opera. </p>
<p>Make senses. </p>
<p>Opera is expensive to produce and it&#8217;s near impossible to take a Met show on the road which means hard core opera fans (and there are few thing more hard core than a hard core opera fan) were deprived of the Met experience. </p>
<p><strong>Prairie Home Companion is another logical candidate</strong> </p>
<p>Much of Prairie Home Companion&#8217;s charm is the fact that it&#8217;s a LIVE show, but of course, a live show can only be in one place at a time.  </p>
<p>Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of fans listen to the show on the radio every week. It will be interesting to see how this works. I have a feeling it will be a hit. It&#8217;s great to people watch, eat popcorn and laugh along with a good show.  </p>
<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PmgMiv1hbVs&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PmgMiv1hbVs&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/01/09/at-last-a-reason-for-hd-prairie-home-companion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube 1 billion views a day</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/10/31/youtube-1-billion-views-a-day/</link>
		<comments>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/10/31/youtube-1-billion-views-a-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/10/31/youtube-1-billion-views-a-day/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How Internet is transforming Internet marketing
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These days, it&#8217;s looks like I&#8217;m posting every three months. C&#8217;est la vie.</p>
<p>The Internet video revolution has come, saw and conquered. What&#8217;s left to say?</p>
<p>Well, occasionally things happen that deserve attention.</p>
<p>Here are two big ones that jumped out at me while I was in the UK:</p>
<p>1. YouTube hits 1 billion video downloads a day</p>
<p>Holy smokes!  There are only about 1 billion Internet users. Does this mean that everyone on the Internet is watching an average of at least 1 video a day on YouTube?</p>
<p>I guess it does and then there are people who watch 50 or more a day. Me, for example. It&#8217;s not hard to do.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t watch TV. Why bother when I can call up anything I want whenever I want? TV is doomed.</p>
<p>2. The Internet creams TV</p>
<p>Speaking of the UK, the amount of money spent by advertisers on Internet advertising in that country just exceeded the amount spent on TV advertising. The numbers are 1.75 billion for online advertising vs. 1.64 for TV advertising. More evidence that&#8230;TV is doomed.</p>
<p>And this is only the beginning.  Looks like the things I predicted when I started this blog four years ago are starting to come to pass.</p>
<p>Speaking of beginnings, I&#8217;ve been going over to the UK occasionally for years but something &#8220;clicked&#8221; for me on my latest trip and after tidying up some business here, I&#8217;m heading right back.</p>
<p>Next year, I&#8217;m planning on spending a few months there as I do in New Orleans ever year.</p>
<p>One of the reasons I&#8217;m going back to the UK so soon is that a bunch of my Internet marketing friends are attending the UFC fights in Manchester. System grad Lloyd Irvin has a team in the competition. To fill out an already busy week, I&#8217;m bringing New Orleans jazz poet Chuck Perkins over to do some gigs in that poetry and music loving city to help open the door for other New Orleans musicians looking for new markets to perform in.</p>
<p>Never a dull moment.</p>
<p>Interestingly, all the guys who are coming over for the fights and the seminar are heavy users of Internet video &#8211; that&#8217;d be Lloyd, me, Greg Davis and Ben Moskel.</p>
<p>Heavy users of video in our marketing &#8211; and we&#8217;re all doing well. Coincidence? I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/10/31/youtube-1-billion-views-a-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monetizing videos &#8211; long videos</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/07/18/monetizing-videos-long-videos/</link>
		<comments>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/07/18/monetizing-videos-long-videos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/07/18/monetizing-videos-long-videos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Monetizing videos &#8211; long videos

We&#39;re coming up on the fourth anniversary of the System Video Blog so I took some time to go over the past four years worth of articles. I&#39;m happy to say in all that time, we never steered you wrong.&#0160;

We said Internet video was going to explode, take over the Internet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: &#39;trebuchet ms&#39;, helvetica, hirakakupro-w3, osaka, &#39;ms pgothic&#39;, sans-serif; line-height: normal; color: #333333; "></span></p>
<div class="entry-body" style="clear: both; ">
<div>Monetizing videos &#8211; long videos</div>
<p>
<div>We&#39;re coming up on the fourth anniversary of the System Video Blog so I took some time to go over the past four years worth of articles. I&#39;m happy to say in all that time, we never steered you wrong.&#0160;</div>
<p>
<div>We said Internet video was going to explode, take over the Internet and shake things up in TV Land and that&#39;s pretty much what&#39;s happened. &#0160;</div>
<p>
<div>Speaking of NOT on target, in the early days of Internet video (remember way back then?), &#0160;legions of newly minted Internet video experts would loudly tell anyone who would listen that Internet videos had to be short or no one would watch them.</div>
<p>
<div>&quot;Viewership drops off dramatically after two minutes.&quot;</div>
<p>
<div>The idiocy of this pronouncement always galled me&#8230;</div>
</div>
<p></p>
<p><span id="more-5"></span></p>
<div class="entry-more" style="clear: both; "><strong>=== Duh!</strong></div>
<div class="entry-more" style="clear: both; ">
<div>Of course, viewership drops off dramatically at the beginning!&#0160;</div>
<p>
<div>That&#39;s because the video in question is not a fit for all the viewers who clicked on it. Those who are interested in the subject will watch much longer videos &#8211; and do so gladly.</div>
<p>
<div>Imagine if the Nielsen ratings counted all the views of people who channel surfed cable twenty times a minute. 2 seconds here on Program A. 5 seconds there on Program B. 3 seconds there. 1 second there.</div>
<p>
<div>By that logic cable and network TV shows should only be 5 seconds long because &quot;the metrics&quot; show that viewership drops dramatically after five seconds.</div>
<p>
<div>Well, until recently, the idiot analysts were winning. Not because they were right, but because they had the momentum of unconsidered opinion behind them.</div>
<p>
<div>Well, the latest stats are in and..</div>
<p>
<div><strong>=== Here comes the reality check</strong></div>
<p>
<div>- Last year, the top 25 shows on blip.tv averaged under five minutes. This year, the number is up to&#0160;<span style="text-decoration: underline; ">14 minutes</span>, roughly THREE TIMES longer &#8211; an increase accomplished in just 12 months!</div>
<p>
<div>- &#0160;Internet video is mainstream now with about 150 million viewers in the US alone (about half the population) and the average viewer is watching&#0160;<span style="text-decoration: underline; ">97 videos per month</span>. &#0160;Pretty amazing when you consider just five years ago, the typical Internet use was watching zero videos per month.</div>
<p>
<div>- &#0160;Netflix has made over 12,000 feature length films available to its customers for instant streaming &#8211; and no one&#39;s complaining &quot;they&#39;re too long.&quot;</div>
<p>
<div>Two interesting quotes from a recent New York Times article on this subject:</div>
<p>
<div>&quot;People are getting more comfortable, for better or worse, bringing a computer to bed with them.&quot;</div>
<div>- Dina Kaplan, co-founder of Blip.TV</div>
<p>
<div>&quot;I think it comes down to quality winning out over minutes and seconds.&quot;</div>
<div>- &#0160;Rob Barnett, Founder of My Damn Channel.</div>
<p>
<div><strong>=== Yes, and there&#39;s more</strong></div>
<p>
<div>As for computers in bed, things are really going to take off when one of the high tech rocket scientists makes it brain dead simple to search and stream online video with a TV remote and watch it through your TV set. &#0160;If that doesn&#39;t toll the death knell for TV as we know it, it&#39;ll be pretty darn close.</div>
<p>
<div>As for quality winning? Not quite. It&#39;s not quality that matters. It&#39;s relevance.</div>
<p>
<div>If I am a left handed Lesbian lacrosse fan from Lithuania, I&#39;ll watch HOURS of left handed Lesbian lacrosse content from Lithuania. Quality doesn&#39;t hurt, but it runs a distant second to relevance.&#0160;</div>
<p>
<div><strong>=== Quality matters only this far&#0160;</strong></div>
<p>
<div>1) Your quality has to be &quot;good enough&quot; to not be totally annoying and&#0160;</div>
<p>
<div>2) There isn&#39;t another left handed Lesbian Lithuanian lacrosse channel out there that does a better job than yours because no matter how we improve the medium, normal people only want to watch one program at a time.</div>
<p>
<div><strong>=== The future</strong></div>
<p>
<div>We&#39;re heading to narrowcasting, even if a few topics &#8211; sports, financial reporting, and big news &#8211; still will command big audiences.</div>
<p>
<div>The future market for the traditional boob tube boils down to this: 1) the technically backward, 2) the institutionalized (in prison, in hospitals, in nursing homes), 3) three year olds and younger who don&#39;t yet have the cognitive skills to manage a remote.</div>
<p>
<div>As I&#39;ve been saying to broadcast and cable for years now: Change or die.</div>
<p>
<div>Best,</div>
<p>
<div>Ken&#0160;</div>
<p>
<div>P.S. Last year, I wrote a little here about my system for creating and promoting on demand, narrowcast Internet TV channels which in 2008 generated over 11,000,000 views for me at a hair less than 1 cent net per view.&#0160;</div>
<p>
<div>Total time involved to keep my &quot;channel&quot; running: 15 to 30 minutes a day. Total capitalization required to get started: less than $100 without ever having to put any additional money in. &#0160;I started two news ones this year.&#0160;</div>
<p>
<div>I only presented the system in two places in 2008 &#8211; both times without tape recorders running. This year, I&#39;m only going to talk about it once: in London in late September at the System UK Intensive.&#0160;</div>
<p>
<div>I&#39;ve made many big improvements to the system since last year in the areas of building in automatic SEO and increasing visitor value.&#0160;</div>
<p>
<div>If you&#39;re interested, this is the event where I&#39;ll be talking about my video monetization system in detail:</div>
<p>
<div><a href="http://www.systemintensive.com/" style="text-decoration: underline; color: #000000; " target="_blank">http://www.systemintensive.com/</a></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/07/18/monetizing-videos-long-videos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hacker makes clueless company $590 million</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/03/22/hacker-makes-clueless-company-590-million/</link>
		<comments>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/03/22/hacker-makes-clueless-company-590-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/03/22/hacker-makes-clueless-company-590-million/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hard to believe, but it&#39;s been three years since I wrote about a little company called Pure Digital and itsinteresting &#8211; but dumb &#8211; idea for disposable video cameras. 
While it was cool to be able to buy a video camera for $29, being able to use it only once was not cool
That&#39;s where the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to believe, but it&#39;s been three years since I wrote about a little company called Pure Digital and its<br />interesting &#8211; but dumb &#8211; idea for disposable video cameras. </p>
<p>While it was cool to be able to buy a video camera for $29, being able to use it only once was not cool</p>
<p>That&#39;s where the hacker came in. </p>
</p>
<p><span id="more-6"></span></p>
<p>As I reported nearly three years ago, hackers were already at work to unlock the camera&#39;s &quot;one use&quot;<br />limitation so it could be used over and over again. </p>
<p>To its credit, the Pure Digital got a clue, raised the price on its cameras significantly and took over the market for super small, super cheap video cameras beating giants like Sony and Panasonic. </p>
<p>The result is they just sold their company to Cicso for $590 million dollars. Not bad considering all the gloom and doom these days. </p>
<p>What&#39;s the message? There are actually lots of them. </p>
<p>1. Listen to your customers &#8211; even people who are hacking your products</p>
<p>2. The right idea at the right time executed the right way trumps bad times and big companies</p>
<p>3. You really should be paying close attention to what we&#39;re up to at the System. We constantly catch meaningul trends and opportunities long before they appear on the radar screens of others. </p>
<p>They&#39;re still time to find out what we&#39;re doing at System 2009 this march 27 &amp; 29 in Chicago:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thesystemseminar.com/inc.html">http://www.thesystemseminar.com/inc.html</a></p>
<p>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/03/22/hacker-makes-clueless-company-590-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Attention jazz fans&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/01/03/attention-jazz-fans/</link>
		<comments>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/01/03/attention-jazz-fans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 10:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/01/03/attention-jazz-fans/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Can you put your offering in a headline with the formula &#34;Attention (fill in the blank)&#34;?



If not, you may have what I call a &#34;diffused&#34; (widely scattered) audience. 
Not that &#34;diffused&#34; and &#34;difficult&#34; start with the
same four letters.&#0160; 




I could also add to that the word &#34;diffident&#34; which means &#34;lacking in confidence&#34; &#8211; something marketers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Can you put your offering in a headline with the formula &quot;Attention (fill in the blank)&quot;?
</p>
<div class="entry-content">
<div class="entry-body">
<p>If not, you may have what I call a &quot;diffused&quot; (widely scattered) audience. </p>
<p>Not that &quot;diffused&quot; and &quot;difficult&quot; start with the<br />
same four letters.&#0160; </p>
</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><span id="more-7"></span></p>
<p>I could also add to that the word &quot;diffident&quot; which means &quot;lacking in confidence&quot; &#8211; something marketers who don&#39;t have a<br />
clear target in mind eventually become. </p>
<p>The solution is another &quot;diff&quot; word: differentiate, one meaning of which is &quot;to make specialized or distinct.&quot;</p>
<p>If you&#39;re aiming at a target, it helps a lot if there&#39;s one clear target and there&#39;s a big red bulls eye painted on it. </p>
<p>What does this have to do with monetizing web video?</p>
<p>A lot. </p>
<p>There<br />
are many fascinating topics in the world, but unless you want to become<br />
like &quot;YouTube&quot; what you&#39;re really looking for is not a topic, but a<br />
clearly differentiated market. </p>
<p>One of the bells your advertising MUST ring in your prospect&#39;s mind if you want to be successful is the &quot;This is for ME!&quot; bell. </p>
<p>That&#39;s hard to do if you&#39;re trying to be all things to all people. </p>
<p>I see this mistake being made over and over again.</p>
<p>If<br />
you&#39;re YouTube, maybe you can get away with it (though I&#39;m not sure that YouTube with its tens of billions of views is doing that well. )</p>
<p>But if have e a one-person operation (or one that aspires to run &quot;lean and mean&quot; forever) you need tightly focused targets. </p>
<p>It&#39;s<br />
true that one micro-market might not be enough to support you, but if<br />
you target a micro-market you will get that business to its natural critical mass<br />
much faster and you&#39;ll get a much better yield on the market you attract. Then,<br />
once that enterprise is on solid ground, you can start another one. </p>
<p>What does all this have to so with marketing video on the web?</p>
<p>A lot.  </p>
<p>Here&#39;s an example of someone who &quot;gets&quot; this.</p>
<p>If you&#39;re a jazz fan, you will LOVE it and will want to subscribe and tell all your fellow jazz fans about it. </p>
<p>If you&#39;re not, you should still study what this guy is doing. Simplicity can be deceiving.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jazzonthetube.com/page/16.html" title="Example of web video publishing">http://www.jazzonthetube.com/page/16.html</a></p>
<p>Ken </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/01/03/attention-jazz-fans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

