<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Looking at Video on the Web with Ken McCarthy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://systemvideoblog.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://systemvideoblog.com</link>
	<description>Video, filmmaking, marketing and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 14:05:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Social media reality check (again)</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/04/22/social-media-reality-check-again/</link>
		<comments>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/04/22/social-media-reality-check-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 02:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social media is hot. 
It&#8217;s also one of the hottest refuges for scammers and BS artists. 
I recently made the mistake of doing some pro bono work for a good cause run by amateurs. (Long story and a mistake I will never repeat.)
Throughout the process, I&#8217;ve been told I have to meet with this social [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social media is hot. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s also one of the hottest refuges for scammers and BS artists. </p>
<p>I recently made the mistake of doing some pro bono work for a good cause run by amateurs. (Long story and a mistake I will never repeat.)</p>
<p>Throughout the process, I&#8217;ve been told I have to meet with this social marketing expert and that one, the implication being they have something of value to bring to the party that&#8217;s more important than actually getting the job done.  (These folks LOVE meetings. They don&#8217;t like work.) </p>
<p>Meanwhile, I patiently try to explain to these wing nuts that the only currency that means anything in Internet marketing is the size of your e-mail list (prospects and customers). Not how many &#8220;friends&#8221; you have, how many people &#8220;follow&#8221; you on Twitter, or how much chatter there is about you in the blogosphere. </p>
<p>Hey, I like Twitter and I know people who get some good things from Facebook, but I don&#8217;t know anyone who would trade a solid e-mail list to become king of Twitter or Facebook. </p>
<p>Conversely, I know plenty of social media masters who are one step away from living in a &#8220;van down by the river.&#8221; (Google it. If you don&#8217;t know the Saturday Night Live routine that phrase is from, you&#8217;re in for some serious laughter.)</p>
<p>Anyway, after listening the the millionth and one social media &#8220;genius&#8221;  I took a look at some of my own social media stats. (My social media weapon of choice being video.)</p>
<p>Here are my numbers: </p>
<p>1. I&#8217;ve pushed one video over the 2,800,000 views mark<br />
2. I&#8217;ve pushed two over the 1,200,000 views mark<br />
3. I&#8217;ve pushed seventeen over the 100,000 view mark (sixteen singehandedly, one in partnership)</p>
<p>Total cash expenditure: zero dollars.</p>
<p> It was all accomplished by viral marketing, also know as &#8220;word of mouth&#8221; and all these hits were kicked off with mailing to an e-mail list. No Twitter. No Facebook. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure there are social media &#8220;gurus&#8221; who could turn these stats into speaking gigs at the latest social media conferences, television appearances, and books on how to &#8220;crush it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Me? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m very unimpressed by my own accomplishments. </p>
<p>Why? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m in SALES.</p>
<p>How many leads did I generate? How many sales did I close? How many people did I induce to come back and buy a second and third and fourth time? </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get real folks. </p>
<p>Social media is gravy. </p>
<p>You better have a meal to put it on. </p>
<p>Focus on what matters. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/04/22/social-media-reality-check-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to get an Academy Award nomination &#8211; on a budget</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/03/03/how-to-get-an-academy-award-nomination/</link>
		<comments>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/03/03/how-to-get-an-academy-award-nomination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academy award documentary how to]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/?p=171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;When all the odds are stacked against you
My friend Rick Goldsmith has just received his second nomination for an Academy Award, this time for his feature length documentary &#8220;The Most Dangerous Man in America&#8221; which he made with Judith Erhlich. 
Rick&#8217;s previous nomination was for &#8220;Tell the Truth and Run.&#8221; 
That was back in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8230;When all the odds are stacked against you</strong></p>
<p>My friend Rick Goldsmith has just received his <em><strong>second</strong></em> nomination for an Academy Award, this time for his feature length documentary &#8220;The Most Dangerous Man in America&#8221; which he made with Judith Erhlich. </p>
<p>Rick&#8217;s previous nomination was for &#8220;Tell the Truth and Run.&#8221; </p>
<p>That was back in the days when the web was young (mid 1990s.) Rick and I put together one of the first web sites built around a movie. The site looks pretty primitive now, but pioneering things often do.  (We haven&#8217;t updated it in at least ten years, but it still gets the job done!)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty amazing to get nominated for an Academy Award, even more amazing for it to happen twice.. especially for films made on a limited budget and on serious subjects.<br />
<span id="more-171"></span><br />
Rick specializes in making films about people who tell the truth under difficult circumstances, something this country and world can use a lot more of. </p>
<p><strong>How to get nominated for an Academy Award &#8211; Step One</strong></p>
<p>Truth be told, I don&#8217;t know 101 techniques to get nominated for an Academy Award, but I do know the details of how Rick got nominated the first time. It&#8217;s a story that has inspired me continuously since the day I first heard it and I&#8217;ve shared it with many people over the years.</p>
<p>The topic: George Seldes&#8230;the grandfather of investigative journalism in America. </p>
<p>Among other things,  Seldes was  the first to report on the cover up of the science that showed modern cigarettes were designed to be addictive and caused cancer (this back in the 1940s!) His work inspired Studs Turkel, Howard Zinn,  Ralph Nader, IF Stone, and the subject of &#8220;The Most Dangerous Man in America&#8221; Daniel Ellsberg. </p>
<p>Rick learned about Seldes after learning that Seldes had passed his 100th birthday and shot some interviews with him using a Hi8 video camera. </p>
<p>Over time (and on his own time), Rick developed these interviews into a full length feature documentary <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117873/">Tell the Truth and Run</a> which captured not only the details of Seldes&#8217; remarkable career, but also many of the big events of world history from the World War I to the Cold War.  Along the way, he recruited Susan Sarandon and Ed Asner as narrators. </p>
<p>Step One: Make a great piece on a subject you believe in and get it done any way you can.</p>
<p><strong>How to get nominated for an Academy Award &#8211; Step Two</strong></p>
<p>The original version of &#8220;Tell the Truth and Run&#8221; was actually a <strong><em>video</em></strong> which made it ineligible  for an Academy Award, so getting a nomination was the furthest thing from Rick&#8217;s mind. Nonetheless, he carried out the second essential task in making a film which is to tirelessly promote the finished work.</p>
<p>One of the places he brought his work to was the San Francisco Jewish Film Festival. A lady in the audience came up to him and said: &#8220;That&#8217;s such a great film. It should be nominated for an Academy Award.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rick filled her in on the facts. In order for a film to be nominated, it has to be on film (not video) and it has to have a run in a New York or Los Angeles theater. (Dear reader: Check the details. The requirements may have changed since the mid 1990s.)</p>
<p>The lady then asked Rick what it would cost to transfer the video to film and exhibit in a &#8220;real&#8221; theater in order for the film to be qualified. He told her and she raised the money and made it happen. </p>
<p><strong>How to get nominated for an Academy Award &#8211; Step Three</strong></p>
<p>Step Three is to contact the Academy and put your film in the running. I imagine all the current information you need to know about how to do this is on their web site. </p>
<p>Here are key take-aways from this story:</p>
<p>1. Rick made the film he believed in, not something he thought would be sexy or award winning<br />
2. He made a beautifully crafted piece of work, in spite of a low budget and in spite of a scarcity of free time<br />
3. He got the film out there and by doing so created fans for it<br />
4. With the help of one fan, he thought &#8220;outside the box&#8221; (don&#8217;t you hate that term?) and turned an illegible video into an eligible one by learning and and following the rules<br />
5. He threw his hat in the ring</p>
<p>End result: An Academy Award nomination. </p>
<p><strong>So what happened?</strong> </p>
<p>Did &#8220;Tell the Truth and Run&#8221; win?</p>
<p>No, that year the prize went to an acquaintance of mine Leon Gast from my Film Center days in New York City. (If you&#8217;re in the film biz you know the legendary/notorious Film Center on Ninth Avenue.)</p>
<p>Actually, Leon was more than an acquaintance. He was the client of an audio post-production firm I helped my friend Bill Markle (aka William Markle) get off the ground back in the late 1980s when digital sound editing was brand new.  </p>
<p>Leon&#8217;s film: &#8220;When We Were Kings&#8221; &#8211; a documentary about boxer Mohammed Ali. </p>
<p>Truth be told, no one was going to beat Ali in 1996, but this year, for &#8220;The Most Dangerous Man in America&#8221;? &#8211; I&#8217;m cautiously optimistic. </p>
<p>After all, the Saints won the Super Bowl. This may be the year when ANYTHING can happen. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be watching the Award ceremony in New Orleans and you know what happened the last time that happened&#8230;Go Rick!</p>
<p><strong>Ken McCarthy</strong></p>
<p>P.S. I&#8217;m not going to miss an opportunity to plug my own work&#8230;</p>
<p>Our annual seminar is coming up soon &#8211; April 9 &#8211; 11 in Chicago. </p>
<p>You can learn about it and actually start learning from some of the industry&#8217;s leading experts, right now &#8211;  for <strong>free</strong>.</p>
<p>Details: <a href="http://thesystemblog.com/welcome-to-the-system-faculty-interviews/">The annual System Seminar 2010 &#8211; Chicago </a> </p>
<p>Why you should consider investing your time in looking into this?</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested in Internet marketing, it&#8217;s possible to learn directly from the guy who put on the <strong>original</strong> Internet marketing seminar and was an early innovator in the areas of: banner advertising  (1994), legitimate e-mail marketing (1994), auto-responders (1997), PPC (2000), online video advertising (2004) and now mobile marketing (2007.) </p>
<p>Since then, we&#8217;ve put on dozens of trainings and helped countless people &#8211; including many folks who are now industry leaders &#8211; get started in the business on the right foot. </p>
<p>You could be our next success story. Why not? Our students, friends, and clients have a remarkable track record of doing great things. </p>
<p>Details: <a href="http://thesystemblog.com/welcome-to-the-system-faculty-interviews/">The annual System Seminar 2010 &#8211; Chicago </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/03/03/how-to-get-an-academy-award-nomination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At last, a reason for HD: Prairie Home Companion</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/01/09/at-last-a-reason-for-hd-prairie-home-companion/</link>
		<comments>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/01/09/at-last-a-reason-for-hd-prairie-home-companion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD live theater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the way HD looks, but for the longest time it seemed like overkill. 
I mean do we really need digital transmission and HD quality on our television sets? Really? 
But here&#8217;s a use of HD that is truly exciting: real time transmission of live performances to theater audiences around the world. 
A variation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the way HD looks, but for the longest time it seemed like overkill. </p>
<p>I mean do we really need digital transmission and HD quality on our television sets? Really? </p>
<p>But here&#8217;s a use of HD that is truly exciting: real time transmission of live performances to theater audiences around the world. </p>
<p>A variation of this has existed for a long time (ex. championship boxing matches), but this is a much more interesting use. </p>
<p><strong>The next best thing to being there</strong></p>
<p>The pioneer of this new approach seems to have been the NY Metropolitan Opera. </p>
<p>Make senses. </p>
<p>Opera is expensive to produce and it&#8217;s near impossible to take a Met show on the road which means hard core opera fans (and there are few thing more hard core than a hard core opera fan) were deprived of the Met experience. </p>
<p><strong>Prairie Home Companion is another logical candidate</strong> </p>
<p>Much of Prairie Home Companion&#8217;s charm is the fact that it&#8217;s a LIVE show, but of course, a live show can only be in one place at a time.  </p>
<p>Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of fans listen to the show on the radio every week. It will be interesting to see how this works. I have a feeling it will be a hit. It&#8217;s great to people watch, eat popcorn and laugh along with a good show.  </p>
<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PmgMiv1hbVs&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PmgMiv1hbVs&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemvideoblog.com/2010/01/09/at-last-a-reason-for-hd-prairie-home-companion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube 1 billion views a day</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/10/31/youtube-1-billion-views-a-day/</link>
		<comments>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/10/31/youtube-1-billion-views-a-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/10/31/youtube-1-billion-views-a-day/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How Internet is transforming Internet marketing
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These days, it&#8217;s looks like I&#8217;m posting every three months. C&#8217;est la vie.</p>
<p>The Internet video revolution has come, saw and conquered. What&#8217;s left to say?</p>
<p>Well, occasionally things happen that deserve attention.</p>
<p>Here are two big ones that jumped out at me while I was in the UK:</p>
<p>1. YouTube hits 1 billion video downloads a day</p>
<p>Holy smokes!  There are only about 1 billion Internet users. Does this mean that everyone on the Internet is watching an average of at least 1 video a day on YouTube?</p>
<p>I guess it does and then there are people who watch 50 or more a day. Me, for example. It&#8217;s not hard to do.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t watch TV. Why bother when I can call up anything I want whenever I want? TV is doomed.</p>
<p>2. The Internet creams TV</p>
<p>Speaking of the UK, the amount of money spent by advertisers on Internet advertising in that country just exceeded the amount spent on TV advertising. The numbers are 1.75 billion for online advertising vs. 1.64 for TV advertising. More evidence that&#8230;TV is doomed.</p>
<p>And this is only the beginning.  Looks like the things I predicted when I started this blog four years ago are starting to come to pass.</p>
<p>Speaking of beginnings, I&#8217;ve been going over to the UK occasionally for years but something &#8220;clicked&#8221; for me on my latest trip and after tidying up some business here, I&#8217;m heading right back.</p>
<p>Next year, I&#8217;m planning on spending a few months there as I do in New Orleans ever year.</p>
<p>One of the reasons I&#8217;m going back to the UK so soon is that a bunch of my Internet marketing friends are attending the UFC fights in Manchester. System grad Lloyd Irvin has a team in the competition. To fill out an already busy week, I&#8217;m bringing New Orleans jazz poet Chuck Perkins over to do some gigs in that poetry and music loving city to help open the door for other New Orleans musicians looking for new markets to perform in.</p>
<p>Never a dull moment.</p>
<p>Interestingly, all the guys who are coming over for the fights and the seminar are heavy users of Internet video &#8211; that&#8217;d be Lloyd, me, Greg Davis and Ben Moskel.</p>
<p>Heavy users of video in our marketing &#8211; and we&#8217;re all doing well. Coincidence? I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/10/31/youtube-1-billion-views-a-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monetizing videos &#8211; long videos</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/07/18/monetizing-videos-long-videos/</link>
		<comments>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/07/18/monetizing-videos-long-videos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/07/18/monetizing-videos-long-videos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Monetizing videos &#8211; long videos

We&#39;re coming up on the fourth anniversary of the System Video Blog so I took some time to go over the past four years worth of articles. I&#39;m happy to say in all that time, we never steered you wrong.&#0160;

We said Internet video was going to explode, take over the Internet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: &#39;trebuchet ms&#39;, helvetica, hirakakupro-w3, osaka, &#39;ms pgothic&#39;, sans-serif; line-height: normal; color: #333333; "></span></p>
<div class="entry-body" style="clear: both; ">
<div>Monetizing videos &#8211; long videos</div>
<p>
<div>We&#39;re coming up on the fourth anniversary of the System Video Blog so I took some time to go over the past four years worth of articles. I&#39;m happy to say in all that time, we never steered you wrong.&#0160;</div>
<p>
<div>We said Internet video was going to explode, take over the Internet and shake things up in TV Land and that&#39;s pretty much what&#39;s happened. &#0160;</div>
<p>
<div>Speaking of NOT on target, in the early days of Internet video (remember way back then?), &#0160;legions of newly minted Internet video experts would loudly tell anyone who would listen that Internet videos had to be short or no one would watch them.</div>
<p>
<div>&quot;Viewership drops off dramatically after two minutes.&quot;</div>
<p>
<div>The idiocy of this pronouncement always galled me&#8230;</div>
</div>
<p></p>
<p><span id="more-5"></span></p>
<div class="entry-more" style="clear: both; "><strong>=== Duh!</strong></div>
<div class="entry-more" style="clear: both; ">
<div>Of course, viewership drops off dramatically at the beginning!&#0160;</div>
<p>
<div>That&#39;s because the video in question is not a fit for all the viewers who clicked on it. Those who are interested in the subject will watch much longer videos &#8211; and do so gladly.</div>
<p>
<div>Imagine if the Nielsen ratings counted all the views of people who channel surfed cable twenty times a minute. 2 seconds here on Program A. 5 seconds there on Program B. 3 seconds there. 1 second there.</div>
<p>
<div>By that logic cable and network TV shows should only be 5 seconds long because &quot;the metrics&quot; show that viewership drops dramatically after five seconds.</div>
<p>
<div>Well, until recently, the idiot analysts were winning. Not because they were right, but because they had the momentum of unconsidered opinion behind them.</div>
<p>
<div>Well, the latest stats are in and..</div>
<p>
<div><strong>=== Here comes the reality check</strong></div>
<p>
<div>- Last year, the top 25 shows on blip.tv averaged under five minutes. This year, the number is up to&#0160;<span style="text-decoration: underline; ">14 minutes</span>, roughly THREE TIMES longer &#8211; an increase accomplished in just 12 months!</div>
<p>
<div>- &#0160;Internet video is mainstream now with about 150 million viewers in the US alone (about half the population) and the average viewer is watching&#0160;<span style="text-decoration: underline; ">97 videos per month</span>. &#0160;Pretty amazing when you consider just five years ago, the typical Internet use was watching zero videos per month.</div>
<p>
<div>- &#0160;Netflix has made over 12,000 feature length films available to its customers for instant streaming &#8211; and no one&#39;s complaining &quot;they&#39;re too long.&quot;</div>
<p>
<div>Two interesting quotes from a recent New York Times article on this subject:</div>
<p>
<div>&quot;People are getting more comfortable, for better or worse, bringing a computer to bed with them.&quot;</div>
<div>- Dina Kaplan, co-founder of Blip.TV</div>
<p>
<div>&quot;I think it comes down to quality winning out over minutes and seconds.&quot;</div>
<div>- &#0160;Rob Barnett, Founder of My Damn Channel.</div>
<p>
<div><strong>=== Yes, and there&#39;s more</strong></div>
<p>
<div>As for computers in bed, things are really going to take off when one of the high tech rocket scientists makes it brain dead simple to search and stream online video with a TV remote and watch it through your TV set. &#0160;If that doesn&#39;t toll the death knell for TV as we know it, it&#39;ll be pretty darn close.</div>
<p>
<div>As for quality winning? Not quite. It&#39;s not quality that matters. It&#39;s relevance.</div>
<p>
<div>If I am a left handed Lesbian lacrosse fan from Lithuania, I&#39;ll watch HOURS of left handed Lesbian lacrosse content from Lithuania. Quality doesn&#39;t hurt, but it runs a distant second to relevance.&#0160;</div>
<p>
<div><strong>=== Quality matters only this far&#0160;</strong></div>
<p>
<div>1) Your quality has to be &quot;good enough&quot; to not be totally annoying and&#0160;</div>
<p>
<div>2) There isn&#39;t another left handed Lesbian Lithuanian lacrosse channel out there that does a better job than yours because no matter how we improve the medium, normal people only want to watch one program at a time.</div>
<p>
<div><strong>=== The future</strong></div>
<p>
<div>We&#39;re heading to narrowcasting, even if a few topics &#8211; sports, financial reporting, and big news &#8211; still will command big audiences.</div>
<p>
<div>The future market for the traditional boob tube boils down to this: 1) the technically backward, 2) the institutionalized (in prison, in hospitals, in nursing homes), 3) three year olds and younger who don&#39;t yet have the cognitive skills to manage a remote.</div>
<p>
<div>As I&#39;ve been saying to broadcast and cable for years now: Change or die.</div>
<p>
<div>Best,</div>
<p>
<div>Ken&#0160;</div>
<p>
<div>P.S. Last year, I wrote a little here about my system for creating and promoting on demand, narrowcast Internet TV channels which in 2008 generated over 11,000,000 views for me at a hair less than 1 cent net per view.&#0160;</div>
<p>
<div>Total time involved to keep my &quot;channel&quot; running: 15 to 30 minutes a day. Total capitalization required to get started: less than $100 without ever having to put any additional money in. &#0160;I started two news ones this year.&#0160;</div>
<p>
<div>I only presented the system in two places in 2008 &#8211; both times without tape recorders running. This year, I&#39;m only going to talk about it once: in London in late September at the System UK Intensive.&#0160;</div>
<p>
<div>I&#39;ve made many big improvements to the system since last year in the areas of building in automatic SEO and increasing visitor value.&#0160;</div>
<p>
<div>If you&#39;re interested, this is the event where I&#39;ll be talking about my video monetization system in detail:</div>
<p>
<div><a href="http://www.systemintensive.com/" style="text-decoration: underline; color: #000000; " target="_blank">http://www.systemintensive.com/</a></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/07/18/monetizing-videos-long-videos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hacker makes clueless company $590 million</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/03/22/hacker-makes-clueless-company-590-million/</link>
		<comments>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/03/22/hacker-makes-clueless-company-590-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/03/22/hacker-makes-clueless-company-590-million/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hard to believe, but it&#39;s been three years since I wrote about a little company called Pure Digital and itsinteresting &#8211; but dumb &#8211; idea for disposable video cameras. 
While it was cool to be able to buy a video camera for $29, being able to use it only once was not cool
That&#39;s where the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to believe, but it&#39;s been three years since I wrote about a little company called Pure Digital and its<br />interesting &#8211; but dumb &#8211; idea for disposable video cameras. </p>
<p>While it was cool to be able to buy a video camera for $29, being able to use it only once was not cool</p>
<p>That&#39;s where the hacker came in. </p>
</p>
<p><span id="more-6"></span></p>
<p>As I reported nearly three years ago, hackers were already at work to unlock the camera&#39;s &quot;one use&quot;<br />limitation so it could be used over and over again. </p>
<p>To its credit, the Pure Digital got a clue, raised the price on its cameras significantly and took over the market for super small, super cheap video cameras beating giants like Sony and Panasonic. </p>
<p>The result is they just sold their company to Cicso for $590 million dollars. Not bad considering all the gloom and doom these days. </p>
<p>What&#39;s the message? There are actually lots of them. </p>
<p>1. Listen to your customers &#8211; even people who are hacking your products</p>
<p>2. The right idea at the right time executed the right way trumps bad times and big companies</p>
<p>3. You really should be paying close attention to what we&#39;re up to at the System. We constantly catch meaningul trends and opportunities long before they appear on the radar screens of others. </p>
<p>They&#39;re still time to find out what we&#39;re doing at System 2009 this march 27 &amp; 29 in Chicago:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thesystemseminar.com/inc.html">http://www.thesystemseminar.com/inc.html</a></p>
<p>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/03/22/hacker-makes-clueless-company-590-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Attention jazz fans&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/01/03/attention-jazz-fans/</link>
		<comments>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/01/03/attention-jazz-fans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 10:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/01/03/attention-jazz-fans/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Can you put your offering in a headline with the formula &#34;Attention (fill in the blank)&#34;?



If not, you may have what I call a &#34;diffused&#34; (widely scattered) audience. 
Not that &#34;diffused&#34; and &#34;difficult&#34; start with the
same four letters.&#0160; 




I could also add to that the word &#34;diffident&#34; which means &#34;lacking in confidence&#34; &#8211; something marketers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Can you put your offering in a headline with the formula &quot;Attention (fill in the blank)&quot;?
</p>
<div class="entry-content">
<div class="entry-body">
<p>If not, you may have what I call a &quot;diffused&quot; (widely scattered) audience. </p>
<p>Not that &quot;diffused&quot; and &quot;difficult&quot; start with the<br />
same four letters.&#0160; </p>
</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><span id="more-7"></span></p>
<p>I could also add to that the word &quot;diffident&quot; which means &quot;lacking in confidence&quot; &#8211; something marketers who don&#39;t have a<br />
clear target in mind eventually become. </p>
<p>The solution is another &quot;diff&quot; word: differentiate, one meaning of which is &quot;to make specialized or distinct.&quot;</p>
<p>If you&#39;re aiming at a target, it helps a lot if there&#39;s one clear target and there&#39;s a big red bulls eye painted on it. </p>
<p>What does this have to do with monetizing web video?</p>
<p>A lot. </p>
<p>There<br />
are many fascinating topics in the world, but unless you want to become<br />
like &quot;YouTube&quot; what you&#39;re really looking for is not a topic, but a<br />
clearly differentiated market. </p>
<p>One of the bells your advertising MUST ring in your prospect&#39;s mind if you want to be successful is the &quot;This is for ME!&quot; bell. </p>
<p>That&#39;s hard to do if you&#39;re trying to be all things to all people. </p>
<p>I see this mistake being made over and over again.</p>
<p>If<br />
you&#39;re YouTube, maybe you can get away with it (though I&#39;m not sure that YouTube with its tens of billions of views is doing that well. )</p>
<p>But if have e a one-person operation (or one that aspires to run &quot;lean and mean&quot; forever) you need tightly focused targets. </p>
<p>It&#39;s<br />
true that one micro-market might not be enough to support you, but if<br />
you target a micro-market you will get that business to its natural critical mass<br />
much faster and you&#39;ll get a much better yield on the market you attract. Then,<br />
once that enterprise is on solid ground, you can start another one. </p>
<p>What does all this have to so with marketing video on the web?</p>
<p>A lot.  </p>
<p>Here&#39;s an example of someone who &quot;gets&quot; this.</p>
<p>If you&#39;re a jazz fan, you will LOVE it and will want to subscribe and tell all your fellow jazz fans about it. </p>
<p>If you&#39;re not, you should still study what this guy is doing. Simplicity can be deceiving.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jazzonthetube.com/page/16.html" title="Example of web video publishing">http://www.jazzonthetube.com/page/16.html</a></p>
<p>Ken </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemvideoblog.com/2009/01/03/attention-jazz-fans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11,000,000+ video views in 2008</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2008/12/29/11000000-video-views-in-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://systemvideoblog.com/2008/12/29/11000000-video-views-in-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/2008/12/29/11000000-video-views-in-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#39;d didn&#39;t have much time for blogging this year. 
Instead I spent my free time making and promoting videos. 
(Hint: Making and promoting Internet videos pays better than blogging.)
Results: We crossed the 11,000,000 video view mark for 2008 yesterday. No one is more shocked than me. 
Total costs to host, serve and promote?


Less than $100 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;d didn&#39;t have much time for blogging this year. </p>
<p>Instead I spent my free time making and promoting videos. </p>
<p>(Hint: Making and promoting Internet videos pays better than blogging.)</p>
<p>Results: We crossed the 11,000,000 video view mark for 2008 yesterday. No one is more shocked than me. </p>
<p>Total costs to host, serve and promote?</p>
</p>
<p><span id="more-8"></span></p>
<p>Less than $100 for the year. </p>
<p>Net revenue (entirely from AdSense): a hair less than 1 cent per view.&#0160; </p>
<p>Total time spent: 15 to 20 minutes per day &#8211; every day. </p>
<p>If you do the math on the return on my time (assume 20 minutes a day and 1.2 cents per view), you will discover something interesting. </p>
<p>See? I told you Internet video was for real <img src='http://systemvideoblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It took me two and years of modest, <strong>steady</strong> effort to get it to this point. Note the word steady. This is not get rich quick. On the other hand, with constant tending, the revenue is virtually bullet proof &#8211; and it grows. </p>
<p>The tools I used: YouTube, aweber and a very simple web site. And that&#39;s it. </p>
<p>Later when realized what I was doing had promise, I created a custom page creation/content manager program to speed up the page creation process and allow me to track my stats easier.</p>
<p>I explained this unique video publishing system in detail at the Smart Beginners seminar in Chicago and at the UK Intensive in London. The people who attended those seminars were very smart indeed. </p>
<p>I will not be teaching it again in a public setting again until the fall of 2009 at the earliest. Watch this space for details. </p>
<p><a href="http://kenmccarthy.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8345316c969e2010536a31d85970c-pi" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Elevenmillion" border="0" class="at-xid-6a00d8345316c969e2010536a31d85970c image-full " src="http://kenmccarthy.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8345316c969e2010536a31d85970c-800wi" title="Elevenmillion" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemvideoblog.com/2008/12/29/11000000-video-views-in-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you can&#8217;t beat them&#8230;Viacom and MTV figure it out</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2008/11/03/if-you-cant-beat-them-viacom-and-mtv-figure-it-out/</link>
		<comments>http://systemvideoblog.com/2008/11/03/if-you-cant-beat-them-viacom-and-mtv-figure-it-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Video Ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/2008/11/03/if-you-cant-beat-them-viacom-and-mtv-figure-it-out/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems like a hundred years ago. 
Overnight, it became dead simple to copy and post video to the Internet and everyone started doing it. 
Copyright owners wailed and gnashed their teeth. Can you blame them? Suddenly, it was easier to copy and repost their uber-expensive products than it was to make paper copies. (At [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like a hundred years ago. </p>
<p>Overnight, it became dead simple to copy and post video to the Internet and everyone started doing it. </p>
<p>Copyright owners wailed and gnashed their teeth. Can you blame them? Suddenly, it was easier to copy and repost their uber-expensive products than it was to make paper copies. (At least you have to pay to make photocopies.)</p>
<p>To get the ball rolling, Viacom filed a $1 billion lawsuit against Google and YouTube.&#0160; (That lawsuit is still pending I believe.)</p>
<p>In the meantime, someone got intelligent. </p>
</p>
<p><span id="more-9"></span></p>
<p>A company called Auditude ran the numbers&#8230;</p>
<p>It turns out that viewers upload 20 times number of clips that content producers do and viewership of viewer-uploaded videos is SIX times higher than the viewership of videos posted by content owners. </p>
<p>In short, unpaid volunteers were generating more viewers for content owners than the content owners were able to produce for themselves.</p>
<p>MySpace, working with Autitude&#39;s technology, can now identify clips produced by Viacom (MTV etc.)&#0160; uploaded by MySpace customers and automatically attach relevant ads to them.</p>
<p>How beautiful is this?  </p>
<p>Viacom gets paid for its content. MySpace gets paid for access to its audience. Users get to go wild and do what they want to do which is repost video&#39;s they like. </p>
<p>Imagine being able to expand the distribution of your product SIXFOLD by just letting people do what they want to do. </p>
<p>For years, &quot;viral marketing&quot; has been the holy grail for marketers. With help from Autitude, Viacom is getting it instead of filing lawsuits to try to stop it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemvideoblog.com/2008/11/03/if-you-cant-beat-them-viacom-and-mtv-figure-it-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to create a viral video</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2008/10/01/how-to-create-a-viral-video/</link>
		<comments>http://systemvideoblog.com/2008/10/01/how-to-create-a-viral-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Video Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viral video Internet advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/2008/10/01/how-to-create-a-viral-video/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How I created a web page that gets over 1 million visits per month without SEO  or even viral marketing.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I have one. </p>
<p>A genuine viral video</p>
<p>How about 1,234,411 views for one page in September &#8211; with no advertising, no SEO, no nothing? Just raw viral power.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Just in case you didn&#8217;t read that right, that&#8217;s over ONE MILLION TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND views for one page in one month. </p>
<p>Now that I am a genuine viral marketing &quot;expert&quot;, here&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve learned&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-10"></span></p>
<p>But first one more number&#8230;</p>
<p>Total views for this video so far: 2,336, 649.</p>
<p>How did I advertise it? </p>
<p>I mailed the address to my list of less than 20,000 once &#8211; then again a few months later. And that&#8217;s it.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the real beauty of this&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a YouTube hit. All this traffic is coming to my site. I&#8217;m getting opt-ins. I&#8217;m selling clicks with Google.&nbsp; This one page broke five figures net revenue in September (according to Google&#8217;s AdSense accounting program.)</p>
<p>So how did I work this piece of Internet marketing magic? </p>
<p>Two words: Dumb luck. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s right. I&#8217;m throwing my away my chance to be the next Malcolm Gladstone (&quot;Blink&quot; and &quot;The Tipping Point&quot;) by cutting to the chase and telling the truth. </p>
<p>That being said, there are a few fine points I can share about how to profit from an occurrence like this when it happens&#8230;some things you can do to enhance the chance it will happen&#8230;and the &quot;big secret&quot; behind this and all other viral success stories.</p>
<p><strong>Principle #1: It&#8217;s all about the lis</strong>t</p>
<p>Give me the right list and I can put a deranged chimpanzee in the White House. Just a sidebar: Did you know that Karl Rove was, and still is, a primo direct mail guy? </p>
<p>(Note to Bush fans: I did not say &quot;George Bush is a deranged chimpanzee.&quot; I could have been talking about Bill Clinton. Or Rutherford B. Hayes.&nbsp; So don&#8217;t rat me out to Bill O&#8217;Reilly, OK?) </p>
<p>Anyway, having a &quot;hit&quot; on YouTube is the booby prize. </p>
<p>Yes, it might generate some &quot;friends&quot; but all Web 2.0 BS aside, I don&#8217;t want friends, I want <strong>subscribers</strong> (list members) and I want thousands of them. Preferably tens of thousands of them. (Come to think about it, hundreds of thousands of them.)</p>
<p>You want people to come to YOUR site, not YouTube&#8217;s and you want to aggressively go for the opt-in. If I hadn&#8217;t done that from Day One &#8211; and mailed my list a great new video every day &#8211; I would not have had a good sized list to launch the video to in the first place. </p>
<p>Now, because I took this approach, creating a 10,000 &#8211; a 20,000 &#8211; even a 50,000 + views per video, video promotion is no big deal for me. I can do it in my sleep &#8211; to my targeted list. </p>
<p>Notice all the qualifications there&#8230;I have a targeted list&#8230;I mail them something great and relevant every day&#8230;I work constantly to grow the list.</p>
<p>By the way, 100% of my list growth comes from word-of-mouth. Friends tell friends. I do a lot to grease the wheels to make this happen, but that&#8217;s it. I&#8217;ve never spend one second on SEO. I&#8217;ve never bought an AdSense ad. I&#8217;ve never sought publicity. I&#8217;ve never tried to be viral! </p>
<p>I started with a small existing list of less than 500 active people and a little more than two years later, I&#8217;m closing in on 50,000 active subscribers.&nbsp; </p>
<p>There&#8217;s enough room in this particular market for me to hit 100,000 easily, probably much more. But being the &quot;one foot in front of the other&quot; kind of guy I am, I&#8217;m not thinking about that. Right now, I&#8217;m look at 50,000 and then I&#8217;ll look at 100,000 and when I get there, then I&#8217;ll start thinking about the next milestone.&nbsp; </p>
<p>So please, if you want to become &quot;Mr. Viral&quot; (Or &quot;Ms. Viral&quot;) realize that it&#8217;s all about the list. Passively waiting for the magic to happen&#8230;or buying expensive &quot;viral marketing&quot; courses&#8230;or reading Malcolm Gladstone books&#8230; is not going to make it happen. </p>
<p><strong>Principle #2: If you get up to bat enough times, eventually you will hit a game-winning grand slam home run</strong></p>
<p>Since the summer of 2006 when I started the video magazine site that this super hit is on, I&#8217;ve posted 436 videos. Four hundred and thirty six (436.) </p>
<p>My big winner was video #325.</p>
<p>Now please pay close attention to the next thing I&#8217;m going to say:</p>
<p><strong>&quot;Not only did I have no idea that this video would take off the way it did, I also almost didn&#8217;t post it because I didn&#8217;t think it was good enough</strong>.&quot; </p>
<p>Please read that about 10,000 times and then send me a check for $10,000 because that&#8217;s what that advice is worth. </p>
<p>I remember distinctly being tired that night and almost blowing off posting a video that day altogether. </p>
<p>If I had done that&#8230;well, let&#8217;s just say it would have been a five-figure mistake. </p>
<p>Instead of being able to write about what a marketing genius I am, I&#8217;d be quietly grumbling about how much darn work this web site is and how all this Internet video stuff just is a lot of hot air. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s the lesson: In addition to being focused on list building, I work my ass off. </p>
<p>A new video every day. Every freaking day. Without fail.&nbsp; Through thick and thin. For better or for worse. I get up to bat every day. </p>
<p>I laugh when certain people tell me how hard they&#8217;re working &#8211; and then I look at their sites.&nbsp; No quality. No consistency. No critical mass of content. No commitment. Of course nothing is happening.</p>
<p>Behind every overnight, viral success story, you&#8217;ll find a maniac who is probably working a little too hard <img src='http://systemvideoblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Just to put your mind at rest, I don&#8217;t create the videos. I just get them from YouTube or Google video, grab the embed code and put the videos on MY site. Perfectly legit. Google wants you to do it (which is why they give away the embed code.)</p>
<p>By the way, here&#8217;s another news flash&#8230;I never expected this site to be successful financially. It never occurred to me that it was even possible. I built it first for myself, then for some friends, then for all the strangers who started showing up and were really into the topic.&nbsp; </p>
<p>You can cut me another $10,000 check for that piece of advice too. I just gave you the formula for risk-free business success. </p>
<p>Bottom line: No one knows in advance where their big &quot;hit&quot; is going to come from. You create a hit by putting lots and lots and lots and lots &#8211; did I say lots? &#8211; of stuff out there. </p>
<p>Ask 1,000 successful people. I&#8217;m sure that in 99.9% of the time, the thing that &quot;made&quot; them was only a tiny fraction of all the stuff they&#8217;ve done over the years and in many cases it came as a total surprise. </p>
<p><strong>Principle #3: Play a game worth winning</strong></p>
<p>Getting a million people to watch your video of a kitten in a boot on YouTube is sweet. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s also the definition of a booby prize &#8211; unless you can somehow extract value from being the guy or gal who got one million people to watch a video of a kitten in a boot. (Good luck on that one. Let me know how it works out for you.)</p>
<p>No, no, no. Numbers alone are meaningless.</p>
<p>Focus on two questions:</p>
<p>1. Is this video helping me build a targeted list?</p>
<p>2. Can I monetize the list? </p>
<p>If 10 billion people watch your kitten in a boot video on YouTube, you may get your fifteen minutes of fame, but that&#8217;s it. </p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t have a targeted list that you can mail to where you know the people: 1) trust and like you and 2) are interested in the topic you cover &#8211; you will not make any money on the Internet. </p>
<p>I know, I know, there are all sorts of exceptions to this. If you can pay your mortgage with the hope of being one of the exceptions, great. Have at it. </p>
<p>On the other hand, if you want to treat the whole &quot;video on the Internet&quot; thing like a business, you will think in terms of building an audience. </p>
<p>(Time to write me another $10,000 check. I just gave you the one thing the Web 2.0 people never talk about. They&#8217;re always going on and on about &quot;community.&quot; I&#8217;m all for community, but it&#8217;s audiences who pay my bills.) </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a second part to this&#8230;go after groups that monetize well.</p>
<p>In other words, if you have a choice of creating content for pan handlers who sleep in doorways or a content for people who are wondering where best to invest their 401Ks, go with the latter, or ANYTHING that results in people buying something. </p>
<p>We&#8217;re talking about advertising and publishing. That&#8217;s the business you&#8217;re in if you&#8217;re doing this to make money.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Google AdSense makes the whole process absurdly simple. Let&#8217;s pray that they stay in business, maintain the model as it is, and don&#8217;t get insanely greedy. </p>
<p>You send your list members to your new video, you surround it with AdSense ads, a percentage of viewers will click on something, and cha-ching, you&#8217;ve got cash. </p>
<p>I know this sounds too easy and too unsophisticated to be of any really value, but I&#8217;m sorry that&#8217;s how it works. No business plan, no cash flow projections, no pitches to investors. You just get checks and you cash them. How embarrassing. </p>
<p>The size of your check? </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a very simple formula &#8211; another really embarrassingly simple one that will never get me admitted to the &quot;Captains of Industry Hall of Fame&quot;:</p>
<p>&quot;Size of list + relationship you have with list + monetization potential of topic = size of check&quot;</p>
<p>No one &#8211; not Google, not God, not George Bush &#8211; limits the size of the check. </p>
<p>If you can get the formula right, it can be any size you want. </p>
<p><strong>How to learn more</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve shared everything I can easily share with you through a keyboard, but I haven&#8217;t shown you: 1) the video, 2) the site it&#8217;s on or 3) the software I use to create and manage the site. </p>
<p>If I showed you the page that is getting all these hits, you simply would not believe it &#8211; until you saw the stats. It looks like nothing. Remember: I almost didn&#8217;t post it because it seemed a little boring. </p>
<p>And the site itself? Well, it looks like it was created by a deranged chimpanzee.&nbsp; Me in this case. I sketched it out on the back of a cocktail napkin two and half years ago and have never changed it since. It&#8217;s ugly. </p>
<p>The software? It&#8217;s not magic, but it does let me create, publish and promote a new video page in about fifteen minutes day. </p>
<p>If you want to &quot;get under the hood&quot; and see how it all works, plus get additional words of wisdom<br />on viral marketing (there are a few other things to know), I am going to be sharing this material in two places&#8230; Chicago, this November 8 &#8211; 9th and London, UK, November 15 &#8211; 16th.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be offering a full blown tutorial on this as a bonus session at two seminars I&#8217;m offering on Internet marketing. </p>
<p>No tape recorders. No cell phones in the room. And you&#8217;ll have to sign a formal Non-Disclosure Agreement to attend the bonus session where I&#8217;ll be covering this. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the deal: </p>
<p>You can use the info to start your own business, but if you violate the NDA and teach, publish or otherwise share the inner workings of this system, my attorneys will see to it that you put all my nephews through college. </p>
<p>I have three of them and their parents have their hearts set on Ivy League schools for all of them. Did I ever mention that both my brother and sister are attorneys? For real. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve joked about this, but clearly I&#8217;m stumbled on a formula that can create a multi-million dollar business starting with zero capital and needing no employees. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth a lot&#8230;and if you join us in Chicago and/or London (truly smart people will come to both), you<br />can walk home with it in your gift bag.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Details:</p>
<p>Chicago: <a href="http://www.SmartBeginners.com/bootcamp">http://www.SmartBeginners.com/bootcamp</a></p>
<p>London: <a href="http://www.TheSystemIntensive.com">http://www.TheSystemIntensive.com</a> </p>
<p>Ken</p>
<p>P.S. Even if I weren&#8217;t sharing my video publishing and promotion system with you, both these trainings would be worth ten times the tuition. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m the only person who teaches Internet marketing who can fill a room with people who started with zero and are doing six, seven and in one case over eight figures a year in online sales. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty rare for me to offer a small group training these days and in both cases I&#8217;m going to be supported by amazing guest speakers. </p>
<p>P.P.S. I&#8217;ve been writing about video on the Internet for as long as I&#8217;ve been teaching Internet marketing &#8211; since 1994. </p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t it make sense that I&#8217;d be the first guy to really &quot;crack the code?&quot;</p>
<p>Remember, if you get up to bat enough times, you&#8217;ll eventually hit a grand slam home run. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s to yours&#8230;.</p>
<p>Chicago: <a href="http://www.smartbeginners.com/bootcamp">http://www.SmartBeginners.com/bootcamp</a></p>
<p>
London: <a href="http://www.thesystemintensive.com/">http://www.TheSystemIntensive.com</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemvideoblog.com/2008/10/01/how-to-create-a-viral-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
