<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How long is too long?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://systemvideoblog.com/2006/02/13/how-long-is-too-long/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2006/02/13/how-long-is-too-long/</link>
	<description>Video, filmmaking, marketing and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:47:05 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken McCarthy</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2006/02/13/how-long-is-too-long/comment-page-1/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/2006/02/13/how-long-is-too-long/#comment-606</guid>
		<description>Exactly.
Now what would happen if Rocket Boom had a half hour program and you had to watch it from your desktop?
You might say: &quot;OK, this is good, but enough already&quot; and tune out after five or ten minutes.
It&#039;s like having food piled on your plate when you are alread full. Not a pleasant experience.
On the other hand, the two-three minute format is like a tasty snack that leaves you wanting more.
What&#039;s interesting to me is that this bite-sized approach turns you into a viewer who is deciding very specifically what to watch.
Contrast this with the classic couch potato viewer who is looking for something &quot;good enough&quot; and then zoning out was it washes over him.
Also, consider this. On the web three mintues of undivided attention is a ton of time to deliver a message.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly.<br />
Now what would happen if Rocket Boom had a half hour program and you had to watch it from your desktop?<br />
You might say: &#8220;OK, this is good, but enough already&#8221; and tune out after five or ten minutes.<br />
It&#8217;s like having food piled on your plate when you are alread full. Not a pleasant experience.<br />
On the other hand, the two-three minute format is like a tasty snack that leaves you wanting more.<br />
What&#8217;s interesting to me is that this bite-sized approach turns you into a viewer who is deciding very specifically what to watch.<br />
Contrast this with the classic couch potato viewer who is looking for something &#8220;good enough&#8221; and then zoning out was it washes over him.<br />
Also, consider this. On the web three mintues of undivided attention is a ton of time to deliver a message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://systemvideoblog.com/2006/02/13/how-long-is-too-long/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemvideoblog.com/2006/02/13/how-long-is-too-long/#comment-605</guid>
		<description>Ken;
Awesome observation.
However, I find myself viwing more than one short video if I find the production or the topic valuable.
So, in essence, our attention span is perhaps limited to the video but not to the series.
After watching the $40,000 eBay auction video for Rocketboom, I found myself viewing 10 other videos on their site.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken;<br />
Awesome observation.<br />
However, I find myself viwing more than one short video if I find the production or the topic valuable.<br />
So, in essence, our attention span is perhaps limited to the video but not to the series.<br />
After watching the $40,000 eBay auction video for Rocketboom, I found myself viewing 10 other videos on their site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
